Why is this
sort of thing important?
One of our overarching goals is to reach and help
casually religious or spiritual individuals find a more relevant
spirituality as they seek supplementary information from different sources
that might draw on practices or teachings outside of church or scripture.
The following information below is directly taken from
Robert C. Fuller's excellent book, "Spiritual, But Not Religious." While I
could try to paraphrase his writing, he's done such a great job that I'll
just present you with this information verbatim. The following concerns
studies by James Fowler while he was serving as director of the Center for
Faith Development at Emory University. The subject concerns methods for
assessing religious maturity.
If you understand what Mr. Fowler's theories reveal
and find yourself having a small epiphany over Mr. Fuller's discussion of
this theory, you may be someone who can benefit from our fellowship. It's
our opinion that many of us move between these stages often and that this
process of seeking is normal and healthy for the segment of our population
that finds no satisfaction in traditional church communities. We are content
knowing that we might find our highest level of religious maturity short of
Stage Six, considering faith as being open-ended and forever evolving;
affirming that the spiritual journey in and of itself has an intrinsic value
regardless of how far we decide to travel.
So then, to answer the question posed at the top of
this page, we as a journeying community have found that there is more value
in spiritual or religious maturity than trying to live up to the
requirements of a label.
Give this idea some thought.
"Fowler drew on respected
theories in developmental psychology to examine the process through which
people acquire religious belief systems. Fowler discovered that
individuals progress through a series of stages in the course of their
faith development. Most people follow the same sequence of development,
although some individuals pass through a given stage more rapidly than
others (and many find no reason to move past the fourth stage). The first
three stages correspond to the early stages in our cognitive development.
Stage One, primal faith, represents a young child's earliest relationship
with the world. It therefore mostly consists of paralinguistic
dispositions toward trust or anxiety. About the age of four, children
enter into Stage Two, in which they begin to acquire religious ideas by
observing and learning from their parents. Stage Three begins as children
gradually adopt the attitudes and moral rules of their community.
Religious ideas in this stage are one-dimensional and literal. largely
acquired from the stories and rituals they have been taught. By early
childhood, they enter into Stage Four, the stage of conventional faith.
Adopting their community's religious heritage provides mental and
emotional stability. And by accepting their community's shared faith, they
benefit from a state of solidarity or communal belonging.
Many remain in Stage Four for
the rest of their lives. But, according to Fowler, it is inevitable that
some individuals will question the authority behind their community's
conventional beliefs. Stage Five begins the moment people begin to accept
responsibility for thinking through religious and moral issues on their
own. Fowler calls this "the individuating process" whereby people tailor a
religious outlook to fit their individual intellectual standards. This
stage requires a qualitatively new awareness of oneself as responsible for
making personal decisions about what one truly does- or does not- believe.
Whereas Stage Four consists largely of submission to authority, Stage Five
entails active attempts to arrive at personal opinions concerning the
tensions in religious faith: the relative versus the absolute, the
individual versus the community, self-fulfillment versus service to
others, the demands of reason versus the the need for emotional security.
Many of the choices made in Stage Five are ideological, meaning that they
they embrace only one side of each pair at the expense of acknowledging
the important truths expressed in the other.
Fowler's Stage Six moves beyond
polarities and recognizes the truth in positions other than one's own.
This stage recognizes that life itself contains polarities. It is alert
to paradox and the need for multiple interpretations of reality. Symbols,
myths, scientific method, logical analysis, and scriptural stories- some
of which were repudiated in Stage Five- are newly appropriated as
complementary vehicles for grasping the truth. "
|